Follow the Data

A data driven blog

Cars, AI and … Derrida?

Super-interesting essay on intelligent cars, AI, insurance (!), Google’s preference for humans over machines and lots of other things from Steve G. Steinberg, whose blog seems to take the “quality over quantity” concept to a new level. There are about five posts there in the last three years, and most of them are great. Make sure to read “group think“, a 2008 piece about reality mining and quantitative social science, or “human terrain mapping” as the post itself calls it. Anyway … back to the recent AI piece. Some choice quotes:

But, fortuitously, the hype over the electrical car is providing covering fire for a true revolution: the computational car. […] Already, more than a dozen 2010 car-year models offer intelligent safety features such as lane departure warning and adaptive cruise control. Crucially, they do not just flash a light or sound a buzzer when a problem is detected: they autonomously apply the brakes or adjust the steering. The driver is no longer the fail-safe that ensures the machine is running correctly. The driver is a problem to work around. The driver, you might say, is a bug.

And in reference to the concept of LbR (“learning by reading”):

Earlier, I described how an LbR system “knows everything — every single fact, the entirety of human knowledge — but can only reason with the intelligence of a cockroach.” You might argue this is hardly revolutionary: you have friends, even colleagues, who fit this description. The difference, of course, is LbR systems won’t just act like they know everything… they really will.

The most striking claim in the article, though, is buried in one of the last footnotes:

Anyone who lived through the Science Wars of the 1990s, when physicists and English professors engaged in pitched battle over the nature of objectivity, the meaning of (post)modernism, and the drawing of academic borders, will be amused to learn it is no longer unusual for computer scientists to cite works by Barthes, Derrida, and Foucault. Once dismissed as impenetrable, pernicious nonsense, their books are now simply instructional. (A strong rebuttal, to my mind, of the current conventional wisdom that lit crit must become more “scientific” to survive.)

Really?

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

2 thoughts on “Cars, AI and … Derrida?

  1. Petter Holme on said:

    yeah, it would be fun to see those LbR papers taking instructions from Derrida. I think it looks like an increasingly marginalized academic field, AI, has found a peer in PoMo that, whatever references Steinberg found, failed to make a lasting impact on any type of computer science (at least compared to e.g. structuralism)

    . . I should have commented Steinberg’s post. OK I’ll do it tomorrow

  2. Kashif Ansari on said:

    cars cause cancer more than the ciggies you find being demonized today. but they have even solved that problem by developing a car that runs on oxygen and hydrogen combustion and gives off water in the form of steam in its exhaust wastes. of course the technology of man resembles the tiniest pubic lice’s brain so there you have it. life is much more complicated (or simple…depending on the angle you look at it from)!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: