The Journal of Participatory Medicine calling all data geeks
The first, “launch” issue of the new Journal of Participatory Medicine was published today. The articles in it are mainly about “defining the territory”, as one subheading puts it, and about explaining how participatory medicine is important from the viewpoints of different stakeholders.
Esther Dyson has contributed an article (free registration may be required; I first read the article without having registered but had to register on my second visit) where she stresses the importance of data management and analysis:
So, here you have it — a call to inspired scientists, and clinician researchers, data-collectors, and data analysts: Help us understand the evidence that is already out there, but hidden under the virtual mattresses of paper files, incompatible formats, incomplete records, impenetrable bureaucracies.
The journal will be peer-reviewed and freely available on the web. Articles will be published continuously as they are accepted after review. In the launch announcement, the editors stress the importance of broad and accurate peer review, quoting recent complaints that “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines” from a former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine and “most of what appears in peer reviewed journals is scientifically weak” from a former editor of the British Medical Journal.
I recently learned that an online journal about a similar (but different) field, personalized medicine, has been around for five years already. (There may be others too.) The journal is called Personalized Medicine.